Chris MacAskill > Testers had trouble decideding which was worst: Ofoto's washed-out waxy complexion version or EZprints autoenhanced version (double blue) that was too red.  Most people thought EZprints non-enhanced version (single blue) the most accurate, but some chose Shutterfly's warmer rendition because they thought it more flattering.
Testers had trouble decideding which was worst: Ofoto's washed-out waxy complexion version or EZprints autoenhanced version (double blue) that was too red. Most people thought EZprints non-enhanced version (single blue) the most accurate, but some chose Shutterfly's warmer rendition because they thought it more flattering.
Chris MacAskill > Testers had trouble decideding which was worst: Ofoto's washed-out waxy complexion version or EZprints autoenhanced version (double blue) that was too red.  Most people thought EZprints non-enhanced version (single blue) the most accurate, but some chose Shutterfly's warmer rendition because they thought it more flattering.
Testers had trouble decideding which was worst: Ofoto's washed-out waxy complexion version or EZprints autoenhanced version (double blue) that was too red. Most people thought EZprints non-enhanced version (single blue) the most accurate, but some chose Shutterfly's warmer rendition because they thought it more flattering.
See photo in gallery

Comments

|

New comment:

Name: Email: Link:


To foil spammers, enter this code: copy this text in this box: Code unreadable?