<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:exif="http://www.exif.org/specifications.html">
  <title>Ofoto, Shutterfly, EZprints compared</title>
  <subtitle type="html">Scans of 20 test prints sent to 12 labs.  Ofoto (red dot), Shutterfly (yellow dot), and EZprints (blue dots) were finalists for best.  Blue dot: autoenhance off.  Double blue: autoenhance on.  30 customers ranging from pro photographers to consumers we asked to pick best and worst of each set of 4.  Red bars represent votes for worst, green for best.</subtitle>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://cmac.smugmug.com/gallery/36620_zFhwy/"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://cmac.smugmug.com/hack/feed.mg?Type=gallery&amp;Data=36620_zFhwy&amp;format=atom10"/>
  <icon>http://cmac.smugmug.com/Photography/Ofoto-Shutterfly-EZprints/Yarn1/1293390_5BTBC-Ti.jpg</icon>
  <id>http://cmac.smugmug.com/gallery/36620_zFhwy/</id>
  <updated>2007-09-13T11:42:43Z</updated>
  <rights>Copyright 2009, the copyright holder of each photograph.  Some portions copyright SmugMug.  All rights reserved.</rights>
  <generator uri="http://www.smugmug.com/">SmugMug</generator>
  <entry>
    <title>Prints from this car were close and most of the 30 testers said they'd be happy with any of them.  But they tended to choose one of the EZprints versions (blue dots), because they retained t ...</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://cmac.smugmug.com/Photography/Ofoto-Shutterfly-EZprints/36620_zFhwy#1293378_pf6iz"/>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://cmac.smugmug.com"&gt;Chris MacAskill&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Prints from this car were close and most of the 30 testers said they'd be happy with any of them.  But they tended to choose one of the EZprints versions (blue dots), because they retained t ...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://cmac.smugmug.com/Photography/Ofoto-Shutterfly-EZprints/36620_zFhwy#1293378_pf6iz" title="Prints from this car were close and most of the 30 testers said they'd be happy with any of them.  But they tended to choose one of the EZprints versions (blue dots), because they retained t ..."&gt;&lt;img src="http://cmac.smugmug.com/Photography/Ofoto-Shutterfly-EZprints/Concours1/1293378_pf6iz-Th.jpg" width="150" height="101" alt="Prints from this car were close and most of the 30 testers said they'd be happy with any of them.  But they tended to choose one of the EZprints versions (blue dots), because they retained t ..." title="Prints from this car were close and most of the 30 testers said they'd be happy with any of them.  But they tended to choose one of the EZprints versions (blue dots), because they retained t ..." style="border: 1px solid #000000;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</content>
    <updated>2009-07-06T17:19:40Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Chris MacAskill</name>
      <uri>http://cmac.smugmug.com</uri>
    </author>
    <id>http://cmac.smugmug.com/Photography/Ofoto-Shutterfly-EZprints/Concours1/1293378_pf6iz-Th.jpg</id>
    <exif:DateTimeOriginal>1980-01-01 00:02:36</exif:DateTimeOriginal>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>All testers quickly noticed how much sharper the Ofoto shot (red dot) looked, especially in the pink and yellow yarns.  About half noticed, however, the odd lime green of Ofoto and then beca ...</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://cmac.smugmug.com/Photography/Ofoto-Shutterfly-EZprints/36620_zFhwy#1293390_5BTBC"/>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://cmac.smugmug.com"&gt;Chris MacAskill&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;All testers quickly noticed how much sharper the Ofoto shot (red dot) looked, especially in the pink and yellow yarns.  About half noticed, however, the odd lime green of Ofoto and then beca ...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://cmac.smugmug.com/Photography/Ofoto-Shutterfly-EZprints/36620_zFhwy#1293390_5BTBC" title="All testers quickly noticed how much sharper the Ofoto shot (red dot) looked, especially in the pink and yellow yarns.  About half noticed, however, the odd lime green of Ofoto and then beca ..."&gt;&lt;img src="http://cmac.smugmug.com/Photography/Ofoto-Shutterfly-EZprints/Yarn1/1293390_5BTBC-Th.jpg" width="150" height="100" alt="All testers quickly noticed how much sharper the Ofoto shot (red dot) looked, especially in the pink and yellow yarns.  About half noticed, however, the odd lime green of Ofoto and then beca ..." title="All testers quickly noticed how much sharper the Ofoto shot (red dot) looked, especially in the pink and yellow yarns.  About half noticed, however, the odd lime green of Ofoto and then beca ..." style="border: 1px solid #000000;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</content>
    <updated>2009-07-06T17:42:48Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Chris MacAskill</name>
      <uri>http://cmac.smugmug.com</uri>
    </author>
    <id>http://cmac.smugmug.com/Photography/Ofoto-Shutterfly-EZprints/Yarn1/1293390_5BTBC-Th.jpg</id>
    <exif:DateTimeOriginal>1980-01-01 00:03:04</exif:DateTimeOriginal>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Most testers noticed that Ofoto and Shuttefly (red and yellow dots) tend to add yellow, making the flowers unrealistic, but some testers liked the warming effect it had on the somewhat pink  ...</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://cmac.smugmug.com/Photography/Ofoto-Shutterfly-EZprints/36620_zFhwy#1293379_heeYZ"/>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://cmac.smugmug.com"&gt;Chris MacAskill&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Most testers noticed that Ofoto and Shuttefly (red and yellow dots) tend to add yellow, making the flowers unrealistic, but some testers liked the warming effect it had on the somewhat pink  ...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://cmac.smugmug.com/Photography/Ofoto-Shutterfly-EZprints/36620_zFhwy#1293379_heeYZ" title="Most testers noticed that Ofoto and Shuttefly (red and yellow dots) tend to add yellow, making the flowers unrealistic, but some testers liked the warming effect it had on the somewhat pink  ..."&gt;&lt;img src="http://cmac.smugmug.com/Photography/Ofoto-Shutterfly-EZprints/Filoli1/1293379_heeYZ-Th.jpg" width="150" height="100" alt="Most testers noticed that Ofoto and Shuttefly (red and yellow dots) tend to add yellow, making the flowers unrealistic, but some testers liked the warming effect it had on the somewhat pink  ..." title="Most testers noticed that Ofoto and Shuttefly (red and yellow dots) tend to add yellow, making the flowers unrealistic, but some testers liked the warming effect it had on the somewhat pink  ..." style="border: 1px solid #000000;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</content>
    <updated>2009-07-06T17:59:25Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Chris MacAskill</name>
      <uri>http://cmac.smugmug.com</uri>
    </author>
    <id>http://cmac.smugmug.com/Photography/Ofoto-Shutterfly-EZprints/Filoli1/1293379_heeYZ-Th.jpg</id>
    <exif:DateTimeOriginal>1980-01-01 00:03:21</exif:DateTimeOriginal>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The face of this child was underexposed and Ofoto clearly dominated user preference on this shot because their print came out lightest, something that would work against them on almost every ...</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://cmac.smugmug.com/Photography/Ofoto-Shutterfly-EZprints/36620_zFhwy#1285827_73hSs"/>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://cmac.smugmug.com"&gt;Chris MacAskill&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The face of this child was underexposed and Ofoto clearly dominated user preference on this shot because their print came out lightest, something that would work against them on almost every ...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://cmac.smugmug.com/Photography/Ofoto-Shutterfly-EZprints/36620_zFhwy#1285827_73hSs" title="The face of this child was underexposed and Ofoto clearly dominated user preference on this shot because their print came out lightest, something that would work against them on almost every ..."&gt;&lt;img src="http://cmac.smugmug.com/Photography/Ofoto-Shutterfly-EZprints/Blotter1/1285827_73hSs-Th.jpg" width="150" height="100" alt="The face of this child was underexposed and Ofoto clearly dominated user preference on this shot because their print came out lightest, something that would work against them on almost every ..." title="The face of this child was underexposed and Ofoto clearly dominated user preference on this shot because their print came out lightest, something that would work against them on almost every ..." style="border: 1px solid #000000;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</content>
    <updated>2009-07-06T18:05:29Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Chris MacAskill</name>
      <uri>http://cmac.smugmug.com</uri>
    </author>
    <id>http://cmac.smugmug.com/Photography/Ofoto-Shutterfly-EZprints/Blotter1/1285827_73hSs-Th.jpg</id>
    <exif:DateTimeOriginal>1980-01-01 00:03:34</exif:DateTimeOriginal>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Testers did not like how light (they often said "overexposed") the Ofoto version was.</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://cmac.smugmug.com/Photography/Ofoto-Shutterfly-EZprints/36620_zFhwy#1285826_Dp8Fe"/>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://cmac.smugmug.com"&gt;Chris MacAskill&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Testers did not like how light (they often said "overexposed") the Ofoto version was.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://cmac.smugmug.com/Photography/Ofoto-Shutterfly-EZprints/36620_zFhwy#1285826_Dp8Fe" title="Testers did not like how light (they often said "overexposed") the Ofoto version was."&gt;&lt;img src="http://cmac.smugmug.com/Photography/Ofoto-Shutterfly-EZprints/Bill1/1285826_Dp8Fe-Th.jpg" width="150" height="99" alt="Testers did not like how light (they often said "overexposed") the Ofoto version was." title="Testers did not like how light (they often said "overexposed") the Ofoto version was." style="border: 1px solid #000000;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</content>
    <updated>2009-07-06T17:44:29Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Chris MacAskill</name>
      <uri>http://cmac.smugmug.com</uri>
    </author>
    <id>http://cmac.smugmug.com/Photography/Ofoto-Shutterfly-EZprints/Bill1/1285826_Dp8Fe-Th.jpg</id>
    <exif:DateTimeOriginal>1980-01-01 00:03:46</exif:DateTimeOriginal>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Ofoto's version (red dot) was considered "washed out" but the EZprints auto-enhanced version (double-blue) was considered too dark.  Some people complained that Shutterfly (yellow dot) was t ...</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://cmac.smugmug.com/Photography/Ofoto-Shutterfly-EZprints/36620_zFhwy#1292999_pCabY"/>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://cmac.smugmug.com"&gt;Chris MacAskill&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Ofoto's version (red dot) was considered "washed out" but the EZprints auto-enhanced version (double-blue) was considered too dark.  Some people complained that Shutterfly (yellow dot) was t ...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://cmac.smugmug.com/Photography/Ofoto-Shutterfly-EZprints/36620_zFhwy#1292999_pCabY" title="Ofoto's version (red dot) was considered "washed out" but the EZprints auto-enhanced version (double-blue) was considered too dark.  Some people complained that Shutterfly (yellow dot) was t ..."&gt;&lt;img src="http://cmac.smugmug.com/Photography/Ofoto-Shutterfly-EZprints/Bradley1/1292999_pCabY-Th.jpg" width="100" height="150" alt="Ofoto's version (red dot) was considered "washed out" but the EZprints auto-enhanced version (double-blue) was considered too dark.  Some people complained that Shutterfly (yellow dot) was t ..." title="Ofoto's version (red dot) was considered "washed out" but the EZprints auto-enhanced version (double-blue) was considered too dark.  Some people complained that Shutterfly (yellow dot) was t ..." style="border: 1px solid #000000;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</content>
    <updated>2009-07-06T17:26:47Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Chris MacAskill</name>
      <uri>http://cmac.smugmug.com</uri>
    </author>
    <id>http://cmac.smugmug.com/Photography/Ofoto-Shutterfly-EZprints/Bradley1/1292999_pCabY-Th.jpg</id>
    <exif:DateTimeOriginal>1980-01-01 00:04:00</exif:DateTimeOriginal>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Testers were not very happy with any of these and felt they were choosing the least of evils.  But they choose Ofoto as their least favorite for having an absence of color.</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://cmac.smugmug.com/Photography/Ofoto-Shutterfly-EZprints/36620_zFhwy#1293000_cM8R6"/>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://cmac.smugmug.com"&gt;Chris MacAskill&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Testers were not very happy with any of these and felt they were choosing the least of evils.  But they choose Ofoto as their least favorite for having an absence of color.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://cmac.smugmug.com/Photography/Ofoto-Shutterfly-EZprints/36620_zFhwy#1293000_cM8R6" title="Testers were not very happy with any of these and felt they were choosing the least of evils.  But they choose Ofoto as their least favorite for having an absence of color."&gt;&lt;img src="http://cmac.smugmug.com/Photography/Ofoto-Shutterfly-EZprints/Bride1/1293000_cM8R6-Th.jpg" width="100" height="150" alt="Testers were not very happy with any of these and felt they were choosing the least of evils.  But they choose Ofoto as their least favorite for having an absence of color." title="Testers were not very happy with any of these and felt they were choosing the least of evils.  But they choose Ofoto as their least favorite for having an absence of color." style="border: 1px solid #000000;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</content>
    <updated>2009-07-06T17:37:26Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Chris MacAskill</name>
      <uri>http://cmac.smugmug.com</uri>
    </author>
    <id>http://cmac.smugmug.com/Photography/Ofoto-Shutterfly-EZprints/Bride1/1293000_cM8R6-Th.jpg</id>
    <exif:DateTimeOriginal>1980-01-01 00:04:12</exif:DateTimeOriginal>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Testers had trouble choosing their least favorite because Shutterfly's was "too yellow" and Ofoto's was "too washed out."  Testers made their choices quickly on this shot, saying the differe ...</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://cmac.smugmug.com/Photography/Ofoto-Shutterfly-EZprints/36620_zFhwy#1284557_4acMi"/>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://cmac.smugmug.com"&gt;Chris MacAskill&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Testers had trouble choosing their least favorite because Shutterfly's was "too yellow" and Ofoto's was "too washed out."  Testers made their choices quickly on this shot, saying the differe ...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://cmac.smugmug.com/Photography/Ofoto-Shutterfly-EZprints/36620_zFhwy#1284557_4acMi" title="Testers had trouble choosing their least favorite because Shutterfly's was "too yellow" and Ofoto's was "too washed out."  Testers made their choices quickly on this shot, saying the differe ..."&gt;&lt;img src="http://cmac.smugmug.com/Photography/Ofoto-Shutterfly-EZprints/Amos1/1284557_4acMi-Th.jpg" width="99" height="150" alt="Testers had trouble choosing their least favorite because Shutterfly's was "too yellow" and Ofoto's was "too washed out."  Testers made their choices quickly on this shot, saying the differe ..." title="Testers had trouble choosing their least favorite because Shutterfly's was "too yellow" and Ofoto's was "too washed out."  Testers made their choices quickly on this shot, saying the differe ..." style="border: 1px solid #000000;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</content>
    <updated>2009-07-06T17:33:42Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Chris MacAskill</name>
      <uri>http://cmac.smugmug.com</uri>
    </author>
    <id>http://cmac.smugmug.com/Photography/Ofoto-Shutterfly-EZprints/Amos1/1284557_4acMi-Th.jpg</id>
    <exif:DateTimeOriginal>1980-01-01 00:04:22</exif:DateTimeOriginal>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Testers said this was hard to judge because they didn't know the colors but they didn't like the way Ofoto rendered the Nikon logo orange or that they cropped the bottom.</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://cmac.smugmug.com/Photography/Ofoto-Shutterfly-EZprints/36620_zFhwy#1293388_YVv4A"/>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://cmac.smugmug.com"&gt;Chris MacAskill&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Testers said this was hard to judge because they didn't know the colors but they didn't like the way Ofoto rendered the Nikon logo orange or that they cropped the bottom.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://cmac.smugmug.com/Photography/Ofoto-Shutterfly-EZprints/36620_zFhwy#1293388_YVv4A" title="Testers said this was hard to judge because they didn't know the colors but they didn't like the way Ofoto rendered the Nikon logo orange or that they cropped the bottom."&gt;&lt;img src="http://cmac.smugmug.com/Photography/Ofoto-Shutterfly-EZprints/TechLens1/1293388_YVv4A-Th.jpg" width="100" height="150" alt="Testers said this was hard to judge because they didn't know the colors but they didn't like the way Ofoto rendered the Nikon logo orange or that they cropped the bottom." title="Testers said this was hard to judge because they didn't know the colors but they didn't like the way Ofoto rendered the Nikon logo orange or that they cropped the bottom." style="border: 1px solid #000000;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</content>
    <updated>2009-07-06T17:23:26Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Chris MacAskill</name>
      <uri>http://cmac.smugmug.com</uri>
    </author>
    <id>http://cmac.smugmug.com/Photography/Ofoto-Shutterfly-EZprints/TechLens1/1293388_YVv4A-Th.jpg</id>
    <exif:DateTimeOriginal>1980-01-01 00:04:33</exif:DateTimeOriginal>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Testers had trouble decideding which was worst: Ofoto's washed-out waxy complexion version or EZprints autoenhanced version (double blue) that was too red.  Most people thought EZprints non- ...</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://cmac.smugmug.com/Photography/Ofoto-Shutterfly-EZprints/36620_zFhwy#1293382_4uTDw"/>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://cmac.smugmug.com"&gt;Chris MacAskill&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Testers had trouble decideding which was worst: Ofoto's washed-out waxy complexion version or EZprints autoenhanced version (double blue) that was too red.  Most people thought EZprints non- ...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://cmac.smugmug.com/Photography/Ofoto-Shutterfly-EZprints/36620_zFhwy#1293382_4uTDw" title="Testers had trouble decideding which was worst: Ofoto's washed-out waxy complexion version or EZprints autoenhanced version (double blue) that was too red.  Most people thought EZprints non- ..."&gt;&lt;img src="http://cmac.smugmug.com/Photography/Ofoto-Shutterfly-EZprints/Kathy1/1293382_4uTDw-Th.jpg" width="150" height="100" alt="Testers had trouble decideding which was worst: Ofoto's washed-out waxy complexion version or EZprints autoenhanced version (double blue) that was too red.  Most people thought EZprints non- ..." title="Testers had trouble decideding which was worst: Ofoto's washed-out waxy complexion version or EZprints autoenhanced version (double blue) that was too red.  Most people thought EZprints non- ..." style="border: 1px solid #000000;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</content>
    <updated>2009-07-06T17:56:31Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Chris MacAskill</name>
      <uri>http://cmac.smugmug.com</uri>
    </author>
    <id>http://cmac.smugmug.com/Photography/Ofoto-Shutterfly-EZprints/Kathy1/1293382_4uTDw-Th.jpg</id>
    <exif:DateTimeOriginal>1980-01-01 00:04:45</exif:DateTimeOriginal>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Testers felt Jay looked good on all four but the hedge couldn't possibly be the color Ofoto and Shutterfly made it out to be.</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://cmac.smugmug.com/Photography/Ofoto-Shutterfly-EZprints/36620_zFhwy#1293381_7bp44"/>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://cmac.smugmug.com"&gt;Chris MacAskill&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Testers felt Jay looked good on all four but the hedge couldn't possibly be the color Ofoto and Shutterfly made it out to be.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://cmac.smugmug.com/Photography/Ofoto-Shutterfly-EZprints/36620_zFhwy#1293381_7bp44" title="Testers felt Jay looked good on all four but the hedge couldn't possibly be the color Ofoto and Shutterfly made it out to be."&gt;&lt;img src="http://cmac.smugmug.com/Photography/Ofoto-Shutterfly-EZprints/Jay1/1293381_7bp44-Th.jpg" width="100" height="150" alt="Testers felt Jay looked good on all four but the hedge couldn't possibly be the color Ofoto and Shutterfly made it out to be." title="Testers felt Jay looked good on all four but the hedge couldn't possibly be the color Ofoto and Shutterfly made it out to be." style="border: 1px solid #000000;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</content>
    <updated>2009-07-06T18:06:05Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Chris MacAskill</name>
      <uri>http://cmac.smugmug.com</uri>
    </author>
    <id>http://cmac.smugmug.com/Photography/Ofoto-Shutterfly-EZprints/Jay1/1293381_7bp44-Th.jpg</id>
    <exif:DateTimeOriginal>1980-01-01 00:04:55</exif:DateTimeOriginal>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Testers had little taste for a black &amp; white with a blue cast, so they gave Shutterfly and Ofoto low marks.  Also, Ofoto was lacking details in the white shirt because the hightlights were b ...</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://cmac.smugmug.com/Photography/Ofoto-Shutterfly-EZprints/36620_zFhwy#1293389_E8eNM"/>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://cmac.smugmug.com"&gt;Chris MacAskill&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Testers had little taste for a black &amp; white with a blue cast, so they gave Shutterfly and Ofoto low marks.  Also, Ofoto was lacking details in the white shirt because the hightlights were b ...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://cmac.smugmug.com/Photography/Ofoto-Shutterfly-EZprints/36620_zFhwy#1293389_E8eNM" title="Testers had little taste for a black &amp; white with a blue cast, so they gave Shutterfly and Ofoto low marks.  Also, Ofoto was lacking details in the white shirt because the hightlights were b ..."&gt;&lt;img src="http://cmac.smugmug.com/Photography/Ofoto-Shutterfly-EZprints/Toothless1/1293389_E8eNM-Th.jpg" width="100" height="150" alt="Testers had little taste for a black &amp; white with a blue cast, so they gave Shutterfly and Ofoto low marks.  Also, Ofoto was lacking details in the white shirt because the hightlights were b ..." title="Testers had little taste for a black &amp; white with a blue cast, so they gave Shutterfly and Ofoto low marks.  Also, Ofoto was lacking details in the white shirt because the hightlights were b ..." style="border: 1px solid #000000;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</content>
    <updated>2009-07-06T17:57:35Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Chris MacAskill</name>
      <uri>http://cmac.smugmug.com</uri>
    </author>
    <id>http://cmac.smugmug.com/Photography/Ofoto-Shutterfly-EZprints/Toothless1/1293389_E8eNM-Th.jpg</id>
    <exif:DateTimeOriginal>1980-01-01 00:05:14</exif:DateTimeOriginal>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Testers said Ofoto made them look "too pale."</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://cmac.smugmug.com/Photography/Ofoto-Shutterfly-EZprints/36620_zFhwy#1293380_P7KJF"/>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://cmac.smugmug.com"&gt;Chris MacAskill&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Testers said Ofoto made them look "too pale."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://cmac.smugmug.com/Photography/Ofoto-Shutterfly-EZprints/36620_zFhwy#1293380_P7KJF" title="Testers said Ofoto made them look "too pale.""&gt;&lt;img src="http://cmac.smugmug.com/Photography/Ofoto-Shutterfly-EZprints/Groom1/1293380_P7KJF-Th.jpg" width="100" height="150" alt="Testers said Ofoto made them look "too pale."" title="Testers said Ofoto made them look "too pale."" style="border: 1px solid #000000;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</content>
    <updated>2009-07-06T17:19:57Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Chris MacAskill</name>
      <uri>http://cmac.smugmug.com</uri>
    </author>
    <id>http://cmac.smugmug.com/Photography/Ofoto-Shutterfly-EZprints/Groom1/1293380_P7KJF-Th.jpg</id>
    <exif:DateTimeOriginal>1980-01-01 00:05:22</exif:DateTimeOriginal>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Testers felt Ofoto made the car "too orange" and they weren't happy with the color of grass in either Ofoto or Shutterfly's shot.</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://cmac.smugmug.com/Photography/Ofoto-Shutterfly-EZprints/36620_zFhwy#1293383_PxeSd"/>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://cmac.smugmug.com"&gt;Chris MacAskill&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Testers felt Ofoto made the car "too orange" and they weren't happy with the color of grass in either Ofoto or Shutterfly's shot.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://cmac.smugmug.com/Photography/Ofoto-Shutterfly-EZprints/36620_zFhwy#1293383_PxeSd" title="Testers felt Ofoto made the car "too orange" and they weren't happy with the color of grass in either Ofoto or Shutterfly's shot."&gt;&lt;img src="http://cmac.smugmug.com/Photography/Ofoto-Shutterfly-EZprints/Lamorghini1/1293383_PxeSd-Th.jpg" width="150" height="100" alt="Testers felt Ofoto made the car "too orange" and they weren't happy with the color of grass in either Ofoto or Shutterfly's shot." title="Testers felt Ofoto made the car "too orange" and they weren't happy with the color of grass in either Ofoto or Shutterfly's shot." style="border: 1px solid #000000;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</content>
    <updated>2009-07-06T17:22:41Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Chris MacAskill</name>
      <uri>http://cmac.smugmug.com</uri>
    </author>
    <id>http://cmac.smugmug.com/Photography/Ofoto-Shutterfly-EZprints/Lamorghini1/1293383_PxeSd-Th.jpg</id>
    <exif:DateTimeOriginal>1980-01-01 00:05:32</exif:DateTimeOriginal>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Testers focused first on flesh tones and felt they all looked about the same.  About half of them turned their attention to the smiley faces and felt they couldn't be orange like Ofoto made  ...</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://cmac.smugmug.com/Photography/Ofoto-Shutterfly-EZprints/36620_zFhwy#1293386_jjU7x"/>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://cmac.smugmug.com"&gt;Chris MacAskill&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Testers focused first on flesh tones and felt they all looked about the same.  About half of them turned their attention to the smiley faces and felt they couldn't be orange like Ofoto made  ...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://cmac.smugmug.com/Photography/Ofoto-Shutterfly-EZprints/36620_zFhwy#1293386_jjU7x" title="Testers focused first on flesh tones and felt they all looked about the same.  About half of them turned their attention to the smiley faces and felt they couldn't be orange like Ofoto made  ..."&gt;&lt;img src="http://cmac.smugmug.com/Photography/Ofoto-Shutterfly-EZprints/Missed1/1293386_jjU7x-Th.jpg" width="150" height="99" alt="Testers focused first on flesh tones and felt they all looked about the same.  About half of them turned their attention to the smiley faces and felt they couldn't be orange like Ofoto made  ..." title="Testers focused first on flesh tones and felt they all looked about the same.  About half of them turned their attention to the smiley faces and felt they couldn't be orange like Ofoto made  ..." style="border: 1px solid #000000;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</content>
    <updated>2009-07-06T17:25:43Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Chris MacAskill</name>
      <uri>http://cmac.smugmug.com</uri>
    </author>
    <id>http://cmac.smugmug.com/Photography/Ofoto-Shutterfly-EZprints/Missed1/1293386_jjU7x-Th.jpg</id>
    <exif:DateTimeOriginal>1980-01-01 00:05:41</exif:DateTimeOriginal>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Testers immediately chose the Ofoto (red dot) as the single worst print not only of this set of 4, but of the whole test.  They used words like "wax museum," or "cadavers."  But one pro phot ...</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://cmac.smugmug.com/Photography/Ofoto-Shutterfly-EZprints/36620_zFhwy#1293377_mZtqL"/>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://cmac.smugmug.com"&gt;Chris MacAskill&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Testers immediately chose the Ofoto (red dot) as the single worst print not only of this set of 4, but of the whole test.  They used words like "wax museum," or "cadavers."  But one pro phot ...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://cmac.smugmug.com/Photography/Ofoto-Shutterfly-EZprints/36620_zFhwy#1293377_mZtqL" title="Testers immediately chose the Ofoto (red dot) as the single worst print not only of this set of 4, but of the whole test.  They used words like "wax museum," or "cadavers."  But one pro phot ..."&gt;&lt;img src="http://cmac.smugmug.com/Photography/Ofoto-Shutterfly-EZprints/Cadavers1/1293377_mZtqL-Th.jpg" width="150" height="100" alt="Testers immediately chose the Ofoto (red dot) as the single worst print not only of this set of 4, but of the whole test.  They used words like "wax museum," or "cadavers."  But one pro phot ..." title="Testers immediately chose the Ofoto (red dot) as the single worst print not only of this set of 4, but of the whole test.  They used words like "wax museum," or "cadavers."  But one pro phot ..." style="border: 1px solid #000000;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</content>
    <updated>2009-07-06T18:02:58Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Chris MacAskill</name>
      <uri>http://cmac.smugmug.com</uri>
    </author>
    <id>http://cmac.smugmug.com/Photography/Ofoto-Shutterfly-EZprints/Cadavers1/1293377_mZtqL-Th.jpg</id>
    <exif:DateTimeOriginal>1980-01-01 00:05:50</exif:DateTimeOriginal>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>I chose the Shutterfly (yellow dot) version as best because it felt warmest, but testers disagreed, saying the added yellow made the baby look jaundiced.</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://cmac.smugmug.com/Photography/Ofoto-Shutterfly-EZprints/36620_zFhwy#1282432_Tumcr"/>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://cmac.smugmug.com"&gt;Chris MacAskill&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I chose the Shutterfly (yellow dot) version as best because it felt warmest, but testers disagreed, saying the added yellow made the baby look jaundiced.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://cmac.smugmug.com/Photography/Ofoto-Shutterfly-EZprints/36620_zFhwy#1282432_Tumcr" title="I chose the Shutterfly (yellow dot) version as best because it felt warmest, but testers disagreed, saying the added yellow made the baby look jaundiced."&gt;&lt;img src="http://cmac.smugmug.com/Photography/Ofoto-Shutterfly-EZprints/BabyBonnet1/1282432_Tumcr-Th.jpg" width="101" height="150" alt="I chose the Shutterfly (yellow dot) version as best because it felt warmest, but testers disagreed, saying the added yellow made the baby look jaundiced." title="I chose the Shutterfly (yellow dot) version as best because it felt warmest, but testers disagreed, saying the added yellow made the baby look jaundiced." style="border: 1px solid #000000;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</content>
    <updated>2009-07-06T17:38:46Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Chris MacAskill</name>
      <uri>http://cmac.smugmug.com</uri>
    </author>
    <id>http://cmac.smugmug.com/Photography/Ofoto-Shutterfly-EZprints/BabyBonnet1/1282432_Tumcr-Th.jpg</id>
    <exif:DateTimeOriginal>1980-01-01 00:05:59</exif:DateTimeOriginal>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Flesh tones seemed comparable to most testers, but when they noticed the color of the red sweatshirt, they gave Ofoto a severe beating.</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://cmac.smugmug.com/Photography/Ofoto-Shutterfly-EZprints/36620_zFhwy#1293387_xnCGF"/>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://cmac.smugmug.com"&gt;Chris MacAskill&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Flesh tones seemed comparable to most testers, but when they noticed the color of the red sweatshirt, they gave Ofoto a severe beating.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://cmac.smugmug.com/Photography/Ofoto-Shutterfly-EZprints/36620_zFhwy#1293387_xnCGF" title="Flesh tones seemed comparable to most testers, but when they noticed the color of the red sweatshirt, they gave Ofoto a severe beating."&gt;&lt;img src="http://cmac.smugmug.com/Photography/Ofoto-Shutterfly-EZprints/Ryan1/1293387_xnCGF-Th.jpg" width="150" height="100" alt="Flesh tones seemed comparable to most testers, but when they noticed the color of the red sweatshirt, they gave Ofoto a severe beating." title="Flesh tones seemed comparable to most testers, but when they noticed the color of the red sweatshirt, they gave Ofoto a severe beating." style="border: 1px solid #000000;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</content>
    <updated>2009-07-06T17:59:17Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Chris MacAskill</name>
      <uri>http://cmac.smugmug.com</uri>
    </author>
    <id>http://cmac.smugmug.com/Photography/Ofoto-Shutterfly-EZprints/Ryan1/1293387_xnCGF-Th.jpg</id>
    <exif:DateTimeOriginal>1980-01-01 00:06:10</exif:DateTimeOriginal>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The EZprints non-enhanced was cosidered the best of this lot but the EZprints enhanced version was described as "atrocious."  It was too dark and too red.  However, the Ofoto shot also garne ...</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://cmac.smugmug.com/Photography/Ofoto-Shutterfly-EZprints/36620_zFhwy#1293384_s2fWu"/>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://cmac.smugmug.com"&gt;Chris MacAskill&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The EZprints non-enhanced was cosidered the best of this lot but the EZprints enhanced version was described as "atrocious."  It was too dark and too red.  However, the Ofoto shot also garne ...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://cmac.smugmug.com/Photography/Ofoto-Shutterfly-EZprints/36620_zFhwy#1293384_s2fWu" title="The EZprints non-enhanced was cosidered the best of this lot but the EZprints enhanced version was described as "atrocious."  It was too dark and too red.  However, the Ofoto shot also garne ..."&gt;&lt;img src="http://cmac.smugmug.com/Photography/Ofoto-Shutterfly-EZprints/Lowe1/1293384_s2fWu-Th.jpg" width="150" height="101" alt="The EZprints non-enhanced was cosidered the best of this lot but the EZprints enhanced version was described as "atrocious."  It was too dark and too red.  However, the Ofoto shot also garne ..." title="The EZprints non-enhanced was cosidered the best of this lot but the EZprints enhanced version was described as "atrocious."  It was too dark and too red.  However, the Ofoto shot also garne ..." style="border: 1px solid #000000;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</content>
    <updated>2009-07-06T17:22:04Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Chris MacAskill</name>
      <uri>http://cmac.smugmug.com</uri>
    </author>
    <id>http://cmac.smugmug.com/Photography/Ofoto-Shutterfly-EZprints/Lowe1/1293384_s2fWu-Th.jpg</id>
    <exif:DateTimeOriginal>1980-01-01 00:06:20</exif:DateTimeOriginal>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Users couldn't decide whether the pale Ofoto shot or the too-yellow Shutterfly was the worst of 4 pretty good prints.</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://cmac.smugmug.com/Photography/Ofoto-Shutterfly-EZprints/36620_zFhwy#1293385_ShSdv"/>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://cmac.smugmug.com"&gt;Chris MacAskill&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Users couldn't decide whether the pale Ofoto shot or the too-yellow Shutterfly was the worst of 4 pretty good prints.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://cmac.smugmug.com/Photography/Ofoto-Shutterfly-EZprints/36620_zFhwy#1293385_ShSdv" title="Users couldn't decide whether the pale Ofoto shot or the too-yellow Shutterfly was the worst of 4 pretty good prints."&gt;&lt;img src="http://cmac.smugmug.com/Photography/Ofoto-Shutterfly-EZprints/Mark1/1293385_ShSdv-Th.jpg" width="100" height="150" alt="Users couldn't decide whether the pale Ofoto shot or the too-yellow Shutterfly was the worst of 4 pretty good prints." title="Users couldn't decide whether the pale Ofoto shot or the too-yellow Shutterfly was the worst of 4 pretty good prints." style="border: 1px solid #000000;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</content>
    <updated>2009-07-06T17:30:40Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Chris MacAskill</name>
      <uri>http://cmac.smugmug.com</uri>
    </author>
    <id>http://cmac.smugmug.com/Photography/Ofoto-Shutterfly-EZprints/Mark1/1293385_ShSdv-Th.jpg</id>
    <exif:DateTimeOriginal>1980-01-01 00:06:29</exif:DateTimeOriginal>
  </entry>
</feed>
