SmugMug
Home | Login | Help |
 
|
|View Cart
Chris MacAskill  > Photography > Ofoto, Shutterfly, EZprints compared
Scans of 20 test prints sent to 12 labs. Ofoto (red dot), Shutterfly (yellow dot), and EZprints (blue dots) were finalists for best. Blue dot: autoenhance off. Double blue: autoenhance on. 30 customers ranging from pro photographers to consumers we asked to pick best and worst of each set of 4. Red bars represent votes for worst, green for best.
< Prev 19 of 20 Next >
The EZprints non-enhanced was cosidered the best of this lot but the EZprints enhanced version was described as "atrocious." It was too dark and too red. However, the Ofoto shot also garnered very negative reactions.
Chris MacAskill > The EZprints non-enhanced was cosidered the best of this lot but the EZprints enhanced version was described as "atrocious."  It was too dark and too red.  However, the Ofoto shot also garnered very negative reactions.
The EZprints non-enhanced was cosidered the best of this lot but the EZprints enhanced version was described as "atrocious." It was too dark and too red. However, the Ofoto shot also garnered very negative reactions.
Sizes: S • M • Large • O • save photo | Your preferred size: Small • M • L • O
Camera: Canon (Canon Eos 10d) |
More details: exif |
Original size: 2406px x 1614px |
Current: 800px x 537px |
Share photo: links, forums, blogs |
Keywords: lowe
< Prev 19 of 20 Next >

Comments

| hide gallery comments |

New comment: Requires approval

Name: Email: Link:
Connect  Connect with Facebook


Comment on: | Rating: stars
To foil spammers, enter this code: copy this text in this box: Code unreadable?



News | Browse | Keywords | Communities | Forum | Wiki | ClubSmug | Prints & Gifts | Shopping Cart | Login
Terms | Privacy | About Us | Contact SmugMug | Blogs | API | Affiliates | © 2009 SmugMug, Inc.
Show FeedsAvailable Feeds | What are feeds?
Gallery Photos:
Atom FeedAtom | RSS FeedRSS